Unworthy peer review process and publishing method
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Upon Further Review: Peer Process Vital to Publishing.
Peer review is one of the hallmarks of professional publishing and one that I appreciate every day in my work as editor of this journal. I simply could not do this work without reviewers, and all of my editor colleagues across the globe would agree. I have been a reviewer for various journals for many years, and now, as editor of the Oncology Nursing Forum, I am even more aware of how important...
متن کاملAffirming science and peer-review publishing.
896 Am J Health-Syst Pharm—Vol 66 May 15, 2009 Copyright © 2009, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved. 1079-2082/09/0502-0896$06.00. Affirming science and peer-review publishing of scientific exploration if researchers felt constrained from publicly reporting such differences. For publishers, the decision defends the sanctity of the time-honored peer-review pr...
متن کاملOpen access, predatory publishing and peer-review
* In recent years, scholarly publishing faced a new paradigm regarding the accessibility: the open access movement. " If an article is "Open Access" it means that it can be freely accessed by anyone in the world using an internet connection ". 1 The Budapest Open Access Initiative states: " By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any...
متن کاملThe peer-review process.
Most authors experience that “sinking feeling” when reviewers’ comments and recommendations lead to rejection of a manuscript or the need for multiple revisions. It is important to bear in mind that this happens to most, if not all, scientists. Many times the reviewer or editor is correct, and with suitable revision, a better paper is ultimately published. Sometimes it is not. The author can th...
متن کاملThe peer-review process
The peer review process has been discussed at length in most of the established texts on the scholarly communication process, such as Ziman (1968), Ravetz (1973) and Meadows (1974). These authors agree that the four main functions of the scholarly literature are dissemination of current knowledge, archiving of the canonical knowledge base, quality control of published information, and assignmen...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Italian Journal of Medicine
سال: 2016
ISSN: 1877-9352,1877-9344
DOI: 10.4081/itjm.2016.754